top of page

Research & Reports: Top Resources
Professor William W. Hogan, Harvard Electricity Policy Group :
WattTime:
Baringa:
RE-Source:
ZEROgrid Impact Advisory Initiative (IAI):
Tabors Caramanis Rudkevich (TCR):
McKinsey:
Volts Podcast:
3Degrees:
REsurety:
Clearloop:
Energy Storage Solutions Consortium:

Emissions First Partnership Articles
The Emissions First Partnership invites individuals who can add value to an emissions first approach to submit posts. The views expressed in this section are the opinion of each author and are not necessarily shared by EFP.
Email feedback on importance of a consequential framework
Dear SBTi team, Thank you for acknowledging the limitations of the consultation survey and for offering an opportunity to provide additional input via email. We appreciate the openness to continued engagement and would like to submit the following feedback on three specific items that we believe are important to consider as part of the CNZS development process. These points were not fully accommodated by the structure of the survey questions, but we see them as directly relev

Emissions First Steering Committee
Dec 19, 20254 min read
Insufficient Stakeholder Consultation / Allow Anonymity (Sept 29, 2025)
The Emissions First Partnership, a coalition of 32 organizations, including buyers, developers and NGOs responsible for more than 50GW of combined clean energy procured globally since 2008, respectfully submits the following complaint pertaining to Standard Development and Revision Procedures 4.2.1 and 4.5.1. 4.2.1 states: “During the development or revision of a standard, care shall be taken to ensure as balanced a stakeholder group as possible has been engaged for TWG parti

Emissions First Steering Committee
Dec 18, 20252 min read
Lack of Transparent Decision Making / Include Consequential (Sept 29, 2025)
Basis for Complaint: Non-Transparent Decision-Making The decision not to advance the Impact Accounting method for public comment in parallel with the hourly matching methods for Inventory Accounting represents a non-transparent and unexplained deviation from previously established public expectations and the recommendations of the Technical Working Group. Publicly Set Expectations: The GHG Protocol's public blog post from June 2025, "Scope 2 Technical Working Group Progress U

Emissions First Steering Committee
Dec 18, 20253 min read
Insufficient Stakeholder Consultation / Extend to 120 Days (Nov 6, 2025)
The Emissions First Partnership’s coalition of 32 organizations, including buyers, developers and NGOs responsible for more than 50GW of combined clean energy procured globally since 2008, respectfully submits the following complaint under the GHG Protocol Complaints and Concerns Procedure 2.2.1 i (“failure to conduct required public consultations”) related to the insufficient duration of the public consultations for the Scope 2 and Electricity Sector Consequential Methods (s

Emissions First Steering Committee
Dec 18, 20254 min read


Half the Picture: Why the GHG Protocol's Consequential Metric Falls Short
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) recently published its public consultation on consequential electricity sector emissions impacts, an important step toward providing guidance on marginal emissions. However, the proposal diverges significantly from the robust, comprehensive framework recommended by its own Technical Working Group (TWG). While we applaud the GHGP’s effort to advance consequential accounting, the proposed methodology captures only a fraction of the full pictur

Emissions First Steering Committee
Dec 12, 20253 min read


Impact Accounting: Simple, impactful, and backed by science
The City of Cambridge reduced more than 2x the amount of emissions by prioritizing impact. These reductions would not be possible under the Scope 2 hourly and location matching revisions currently under discussion.

Emissions First Steering Committee
Oct 15, 20255 min read


Unlocking Investments to Support Energy Equity through Market Boundary Flexibility & Carbon Matching
Under the current carbon accounting system, companies are disincentivized from investing in clean electricity procurement projects in...

Emissions First Steering Committee
Apr 3, 20256 min read


The Climate and Social Benefits of Relaxed Market Boundaries for Low-Income Countries
Companies are currently disincentivized to support projects that will expand clean electricity access to the over 780 million people in...

Doug Miller
Oct 5, 20246 min read
bottom of page